Preferential votes for candidates
Region: Jihocesky kraj
List of candidates: TOP 09 a KDU-CSL - Spolecne pro jizni Cechy
Preferential votes for candidates – List of candidates KDU-CSL+TOP 09 – a part 1
Table caption
The table displays preferential votes for candidates. A candidate with a seat is marked by the asterisk sign (*) in the Seat column.Candidate | Preferential votes | Seat | Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
serial number |
surname, first name, degrees | age | No | in % | ||
1 | Talir Frantisek Mgr. | 27 | 2 972 | 14.28 | * | 1 |
2 | Klima Pavel Mgr. | 49 | 1 465 | 7.04 | * | 3 |
3 | Bouzek Tomas JUDr. Ing. | 45 | 770 | 3.70 | * | 6 |
4 | Bartosek Jan Ing. | 48 | 1 800 | 8.65 | * | 2 |
5 | Heller Simon Mgr. | 32 | 1 450 | 6.97 | * | 4 |
6 | Trambova Petra Ing. arch. | 46 | 711 | 3.41 | * | 7 |
7 | Vanousova Radka MVDr. | 42 | 440 | 2.11 | - | 1 |
+8 | Hunes Robert PhDr. Mgr. | 51 | 1 161 | 5.58 | * | 5 |
9 | Kudlackova Michaela Ing. | 62 | 651 | 3.13 | - | 2 |
10 | Zdaril Libor MUDr. | 44 | 258 | 1.24 | - | 3 |
11 | Gregora Martin MUDr. | 55 | 634 | 3.04 | - | 4 |
12 | Hladik Petr Ing. | 46 | 453 | 2.17 | - | 5 |
13 | Talir Pavel Mgr. | 54 | 633 | 3.04 | - | 6 |
14 | Horejsi Dominik | 26 | 189 | 0.90 | - | 7 |
15 | Ondrich Stepan Mgr. | 43 | 138 | 0.66 | - | 8 |
16 | Macku Karel Ing. | 53 | 396 | 1.90 | - | 9 |
17 | Dvorak Zdenek Mgr. | 66 | 275 | 1.32 | - | 10 |
18 | Kofron Oldrich JUDr. | 65 | 40 | 0.19 | - | 11 |
19 | Jakovljevic Mirko MUDr. | 60 | 177 | 0.85 | - | 12 |
20 | Hejl Jaroslav Ing. aut. ing. | 60 | 93 | 0.44 | - | 13 |
21 | Peterka Lubos Ing. | 55 | 669 | 3.21 | - | 14 |
22 | Havlik Tomas MgA. | 34 | 89 | 0.42 | - | 15 |
23 | Slabova Katerina Mgr. | 48 | 177 | 0.85 | - | 16 |
24 | Hermann Josef Ing. | 62 | 172 | 0.82 | - | 17 |
25 | Bajer Karel MUDr. MBA | 50 | 148 | 0.71 | - | 18 |
26 | Rihova Ivana PhDr. | 62 | 216 | 1.03 | - | 19 |
27 | Soucek Oldrich Ing. | 54 | 50 | 0.24 | - | 20 |
28 | Svatkova Ludmila | 57 | 86 | 0.41 | - | 21 |
29 | Zitny Miroslav PhDr. | 33 | 351 | 1.68 | - | 22 |
30 | Jelinek Jan | 20 | 153 | 0.73 | - | 23 |
Preferential votes for candidates – List of candidates KDU-CSL+TOP 09 – a part 2
Table caption
The table displays preferential votes for candidates. A candidate with a seat is marked by the asterisk sign (*) in the Seat column.Candidate | Preferential votes | Seat | Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
serial number |
surname, first name, degrees | age | No | in % | ||
31 | Kozlicek Zdenek Mgr. | 42 | 57 | 0.27 | - | 24 |
32 | Matejka Karel | 56 | 177 | 0.85 | - | 25 |
33 | Netik ml. Jiri | 45 | 236 | 1.13 | - | 26 |
34 | Beranek Radim Ing. | 50 | 56 | 0.26 | - | 27 |
35 | Lobik Martin Bc. | 46 | 40 | 0.19 | - | 28 |
36 | Hlava Stanislav | 58 | 86 | 0.41 | - | 29 |
37 | Kostinek Martin | 45 | 49 | 0.23 | - | 30 |
38 | Boska Martin | 21 | 137 | 0.65 | - | 31 |
39 | Sebestikova Petra Ing. | 51 | 53 | 0.25 | - | 32 |
40 | Zemanova Korchova Veronika | 52 | 174 | 0.83 | - | 33 |
41 | Samal Vladimir Ing. | 54 | 74 | 0.35 | - | 34 |
42 | Kothbauer Krystof Mgr. | 31 | 79 | 0.37 | - | 35 |
43 | Vozabalova Ivana | 21 | 94 | 0.45 | - | 36 |
44 | Stodolovsky Frantisek Ing. | 59 | 168 | 0.80 | - | 37 |
45 | Rosenkrancova Alzbeta Ing. | 45 | 69 | 0.33 | - | 38 |
46 | Novy Stanislav Ing. | 52 | 46 | 0.22 | - | 39 |
47 | Novotny Tomas | 39 | 39 | 0.18 | - | 40 |
48 | Kubala Ondrej Ing. | 45 | 116 | 0.55 | - | 41 |
49 | Kudlackova Bozena | 57 | 111 | 0.53 | - | 42 |
50 | Monhartova Jana | 57 | 52 | 0.25 | - | 43 |
51 | Prochazka Martin Ing. | 32 | 36 | 0.17 | - | 44 |
52 | Hrubes Karel Ing. | 48 | 32 | 0.15 | - | 45 |
53 | Mackerle Adam ThLic. Th.D. | 43 | 122 | 0.58 | - | 46 |
54 | Janovsky Simon | 37 | 18 | 0.08 | - | 47 |
55 | Saldova Antonie Ing. | 62 | 15 | 0.07 | - | 48 |
56 | Sena Tomas | 46 | 40 | 0.19 | - | 49 |
57 | Popelka Jiri Ing. | 43 | 121 | 0.58 | - | 50 |
58 | Slama Jan | 47 | 34 | 0.16 | - | 51 |
59 | Kajnar Petr Mgr. | 43 | 85 | 0.40 | - | 52 |
60 | Martinek Jan Mgr. | 31 | 126 | 0.60 | - | 53 |
+) a candidate with a seat won based on preferential votes